| Main Board • Hollister Sale ZJPJ sgopg |
| 09.07.2014, 05:35 - wqcz36rla - Rank 4 - 126 Beiträge
Buzz Aldrin, among others, has noted that orbital space vehicles would have to reach velocities as SpaceShipOne.] Patrick Bishop: "There's a lot that makes me think the X Prize winner is just going to be a footnote. The first trans-Atlantic flight was by Lindbergh,Hollister Sale, right? Not so. John Alcock and Arthur Whitten Brown crossed the Atlantic in 1919. They were British, as was their plane. Lindbergh's flight was not until 1927. The only thing that distinguished Lindbergh's flight was that he did it alone ... and he was an American. But how many American schoolchildren know of Alcock and Brown? If Rutan succeeds, it will add luster to his reputation, but of course he's going to be remembered as a major contributor even if his project fails. If some other team succeeds, it'll be a different story. In 1965,www.marchionniviaggi.it/marchionniviaggi/hcos.aspx, hardly anyone had flown in space. If this privately funded attempt had been made back then,Hollister, the winner's name would certainly be as familiar to us today as Gagarin, Shepard, Armstrong and Aldrin. Today,Hollister, hundreds and hundreds of people have flown in space ... there's a lot less 'market share' for newcomers to exploit in terms of fame, glory and historical recollection. ..." Colin W. Kingsbury: "I'm a certified air-and-space addict (private pilot, own a [Cessna Skyhawk] 172) but I think comparing these flights to anything like Lindbergh's flight would be spurious. The vast majority of people today simply don't care, and there's something to it. We have in fact done these things already, so this achievement is a lot more Amelia Earhart than Charles Lindbergh. "Also,Hollister In Italia, people today have become largely jaded and cynical about the promise of technology. In 1928, technology was cars, washing machines,hollister-se.tripod.com/hollister.html, refrigerators,http://www.produktivmanager.de/, devices which simply made life better with no apparent downside. Today, we have robots that cost factory jobs, telecom systems that allow us to outsource office jobs to India, and credit agencies that know every mistake you made balancing your checkbook since you graduated from high school. With much of the scientific community concluding that space exploration is best done with robots and much of the public wondering why we're spending gabillions to find out whether there's water on Mars,Hollister, there just isn't any romance to it. Looking back on Apollo, which led to so many other advances, most people will now reply it was simply to beat the Russkies, and perhaps it was. "In many ways we seem to be at a point not unlike the , who had assembled perhaps the greatest fleet of exploration known to man,Tommy Hilfiger, and yet let it rot in port after a few trips because they didn't see the point. Having gone from the surface of the earth to the surface of the moon in one man's lifetime,http://es-hollister.iconosites.com/, a rate of technological progress that remains today almost unthinkable, it saddens me to no end to see so many cast |