| Main Board • tiffany and co Ec On Packaging And Packaging Waste |
| 25.07.2014, 13:26 - lomycxrv456 - Rank 2 - 17 Beiträge
Ec On Packaging And Packaging Waste,tiffanys DIRECTIVE 94/62/EC ON PACKAGING AND PACKAGING WASTE: paper on proposed Directive targets from 2006Costs and benefits linked to this proposal Determining the exact costs and benefits linked to this proposal is a theoretical and difficult exercise,fake oakley. It should also be borne in mind that the absolute costs and benefits cannot support a decision on the level of recycling rates 78,louis vuitton outlet. On the basis of the additional amounts of packaging to be recycled in each country (compared to 1998 recycling rates),mcm backpack, the following rough calculations can be given 79: The additional financing need will be of around 700 M. The alternative disposal costs are evaluated at around 800 M. Except for the fixed costs,reebok shoes, these costs will be saved in case of recycling. Additionally,lulu.com, around 350 M can be saved in terms of avoided environmental impacts. This evaluation should, however,louboutin pas cher, be taken with much caution as it is based on many assumptions. Furthermore,juicycouture.com, the calculation is based on material specific targets only. Additional costs and benefits would have to be added for the overall recycling target. The impacts on the relative competitiveness of materials The impacts of recycling obligations on the relative competitiveness of the materials are determined by the additional costs which are integrated into the market price of the various materials. This will vary from country to country. In some countries,nike factory outlet, the full financing need is covered by contributions levied on the packaging put on the market. In other countries,nike free run, all or the rest is financed via municipal waste charges or taxes. Assuming full integration of the additional financing need into the prices of materials put on the market,prada shoes, the following price changes would occur as a result of increasing the recycling rates from current levels to the proposed targets 80: 6 /t for paper (135 M/24 Mt),kate spade, 23 /t for metals (94 M/4.1 Mt),mulberry outlet, 13 /t for glass (198 M/15 Mt) and 33 /t for (300 M/9 Mt). Internal Market aspects Given the current situation of packaging recycling,ray ban outlet, the revision proposal should lead to a greater coherence of the Internal Market through a further increase in recycling in those countries who did not achieve high recycling rates so far. Those countries with already high recycling rates will not have to increase their current recycling rates. As far as the free circulation of packaged goods is concerned,true religion outlet store, it is not expected that the proposed revision will have a considerable impact. This may be one of the issues to be addressed in a subsequent revision of the Packaging Directive. Annex 1: Detailed calculation of the total costs and benefits of the proposal81 Table 6: Quantities of additional packaging to be recycled under the new material specific targets (2006 compared to 199  and cardboard10 burberry conditioning for muay thai air max Have It In The Bag With Pricey lancel Director Michael Bay gucci Intact Benetton Shirt Miraculously Pulled Fr gucci How Do You Spot A Fake Chanel Handbag |